Comments

167Very true, People and Process go hand in hand. Its the
Posted by nINAD on 2007-08-28 02:40:12 1\n
168I came across this site accidentally. Very nice article. I really liked
Posted by Pavi Agrawal on 2007-09-06 12:06:45 1\n
169Hi is this our president indeed blogging, I was there in today
Posted by Anish on 2007-09-13 14:32:14 1\n
170Dear Sir, I am a transformer of your organization.Was going through your blog.Generally,I find your comment to be really a part of What I say as one of the verses in the Blue Book
Posted by Bijoy Raj Guha on 2007-09-14 06:20:51 1\n
171Should not people process enable innovation or creativity . This may be a factor that can distinguish a company form its competitor. People process should not create a pipeline of leaders who are commissars and no "yogi's" 
Posted by Ravishankar on 2007-12-21 11:15:10 1\n
172If we have failures, is the cause missing items in the process or the the right people? I beleive that the key is to take the lessons learnt and use it to bring about the required change in the process. Motivate and challenge the people by considering their additional experience on how not to fail.
Posted by Sunil Prasad on 2008-02-10 02:31:11 1\n
173It is quite a coincidence that i have managed to read up a reference to you in an HBR article, the last Friday Eco Times CD and now this blog in a matter of 3 days. It is a compelling message to dialogue with my namesake :-) I like the simplicity of your expession and the accompanying focus. You make a point about evaluating individuals accurately and in-depth that i wanted to engage on. It raises certain questions in my mind. Do we as fellow human beings have a right to 'evaluate' or 'understand deeply'? I personally believe in the latter. And the intent of this understanding is critical. It is only so that we can fit a square peg in a square hole and vice versa. I remember extended dialogues in our organization when, as Head of Strategic HR in Bharti Airtel, I was driving the build of a talent management process. After much deliberation, we chose the phrase 'Growth Potential over 'Potential' and 'Contribution' over 'Performance'. The second is not so relevant here but the first one is. The belief was that some people will not fit into the organizational context. However, that does not mean they do not have potential. It only means that their personal and organizational contexts do not match and hence, they do not have the growth potential within our organization. After all, a brilliant NASA scientist would find it difficult to be a High Potential in Airtel, will he not? Helping them to discover their 'drill' (job option) that would align with their 'thrill' (passion) and 'skill' (competencies) would be the only right thing to do. (I like to call this Tresonance or Transformational Resonance)Without specifying this context, the word 'evaluation' can send seriously different messages in an organization.
Posted by Vinit Taneja on 2008-06-02 17:51:46 1\n
174Thought provoking, thanks for sharing. "It is only with an effective people process in place that an organization can move towards success with any degree of surety"...and the attributes quoted for maintaining good people processes are interesting. I believe, to achieve any of these attributes, 'live HR information' is critical and HR office will fail if they take weeks to generate/supply accurate and business critical HR information.
Posted by Sreekumar J on 2009-11-10 11:57:57 1\n

Join The Conversation